BtrFS r6 (See the current copy)

Butter Filesystem. Hold the toast.

I've started experimenting with BtrFS which aims to provide an "advanced and modern filesystem" (heavily compared to ZFS) on Linux. With my new workstation I've started using BtrFS for my home directories (/home) and my build directories (/mnt/slackbuilds) to gain exposure to the filesystem and compare it to ZFS and EXT4 on LVM (all of my other data, including my root disk is on EXT4 on LVM).

I have used ZFS heavily in the past, and using BtrFS is significantly different as many of the fundamental concepts are different. BtrFS has no concept of "pools" or "volume groups" -- instead there are "volumes." BtrFS has no concept of "datasets" or "logical volumes" -- instead there are "subvolumes".

Here's a comparison between ZFS, BtrFS, and EXT4 on LVM:

ZFS BtrFS EXT4 and LVM
Commands Involved zpool, zfs mkfs.btrfs, btrfs pvcreate, vgcreate, lvcreate, mkfs.ext4
Grow Online Yes Yes Yes
Shrink No Online Offline
Re-balance No Yes Can be done manually (pvmove)
Stability Stable Unstable (On-disk format Stable) Stable
Can be Root filesystem Yes Yes Yes
Can provide swapspace Yes (zvols) No Yes (lvm)
Pool of disks "zpool" "volume" "volume group"
Mountable unit "dataset" "volume" and "subvolume" "logical volume"
Checksumming Yes Yes No
Correctable Checksum Errors Yes ??? No
Compression Yes Yes No
De-duplication Yes No No
Ditto Blocks Yes ??? No
Tiered Caching Yes No No
Writable Snapshots Yes (clone) Yes Yes
Copy-on-Write Fast, space-efficient Fast, space-efficient Slow, requires pre-allocating an LV
Redundancy Mirroring and Parity (x1, x2, x3) Mirroring Mirroring, though you can software raid the PVs
CLI-System Integration [1] Strong Weak Mild

[1] For lack of a better term -- how well the command line interface integrates with the system as a whole, this might be subjective.